Tuesday, July 31, 2007

Advice To Collectors

This has got to be the most honest advice ever from a collector's guide book:
McKeown's book states this advice for camera collectors:

1."If you pass up the chance to buy a camera you really want, you will never have that chance again."

2."If you buy a camera because you know you will never have the chance again, a better example of the same camera will be offered to you a week later for a much lower price."

3. "The intrinsic value of an antique or classic camera is directly proportional to the owner's certainty that someone else wants it." - Dan Adams.

These observations should apply to any item, just substitute your obsession for camera.
So The Dean notes in his article Antique and Collectible Guide Books, Lalique to Hummel Collections as he quotes from McKeown's Price Guide to Antique and Classic Cameras. (Which explains why I had not read that before; I don't collect cameras, but prefer what's on the other side of them. *wink*)

Labels: , ,

Rear End Strip Club Sign

Monday, July 30, 2007

Homo-Erotic Quest

"My" Fabulon Thom (which is really strange in print, ey?) has a request... Here's our conversation:

Thom: For over a decade I have been on a relatively unfruitful quest for gay erotica from the Edwardian and even Victorian eras. I know it exists, having seen some long ago, and it truly intrigues me (for reasons not soley pornographic, but also sociological). A major interest for me is gay history, how things were at different times and how they helped create the present.

Me: Your interests are similar to mine -- it's not all about the 'porn arousal' (I won't lie and say nude bods hold no interest for me, but it's more than that -- like a sexy partner, there ought to be something to last past the roll in the hay lol)

The Internet offers much, but at the same time, so many dealers list in ways which do not make it findable (don't label images, don't use tags or text descriptions which make it findable in google etc). I mostly stumble into things rather than rely on searches (which can be most frustrating). And heck, how many times do you even know the name of the photographer etc until after you see the item, learn of its existence, to know that information? ;)

Thom: I remember once seeing a very old photo done in some sort of studio set-up, with what appeared to be adult men, a dozen or so, engaged in various acts with younger guys, apparently teens. The men all had handlebar mustaches and garters to keep their socks up. What clothing there was seemed to be some sort of sports uniform. It was quite a turn-on, but mostly it made me curious. What exactly was going on here? How did this happen? Why was this photographed, and how? What's the story? Especially in that day and age, before things were labelled "gay" and "straight". It really sort of blew my mind!

SO---I was wondering if, on your Internet journeys, you have chanced upon any sites along those lines. Usually when I look for photos of the vintage variety, what turns up is old midcentury physique pictorials, which are fine and quite fun but not what I'm really seeking.

And so, here we are ;)

All I can think of is Wilhelm von Gloeden... For photos that is.

There's also Aubrey Beardsley. DelftBoys.com had a general overview of homo-erotic art.

Of course I offered to post a 'help' call, so all you folks can post your leads, sources, and info.

So now, it's your turn... Post &/or contact Thom via email (located in his blogger profile).

Labels: , , , , , ,

A LuLu Of A Post

While I was away Tom Paine finished up his three-part series on Brooksie, the lovely Louise Brooks. (At the end of that part you'll see links to the first two parts.)

In this final installment Tom opened a can of worms for using the words 'tragic' and 'aging' too close together. Reading Tom as I do, I didn't make the mistake some posters did assuming him to be anti older women. But I can't help but feel the elephant in the room...

It is tragic that humans age as they do. This is especially true for women. Beauty, for all its non-conformity as far as fashion, is tied to youth, health and the ability to conceive. That's basic biology. It's so tied to this that it's true for those who do not want children and, going out on a limb here, it's still a part of non-hetero mate(ing) selection. Youth, with its supple un-lined skin and full healthy hair, signals prime health conditions -- and that is what secures the species. Screw what leads the herd; eat the weak, maimed and unhealthy stragglers at the end of it.

Yes, we are more capable of emotional and intellectual attraction 'above' that of our 'true' animal relatives. We can fall in love with and remain (happily) in love with the infertile, the sick, those minus limbs, the dying; but forgetting we are animals too means trouble. Sperm meets egg, hormones race, penis and/or nipples erect, and much of that is biology and our very own damn animal parts. Much of it is affected by youth or the loss thereof, so don't kid yourself that we humans are free from all that. It's there. It's one of the many layers in our sex onions.

As a woman, I mourn the loss of youth and what it means. Not just the attraction, not just the 'pretty,' but the reminder that I am moving from the front of the herd to the back where there is real trouble. This is why we 'higher animals' nip, suck and tuck among other things. We want to hold onto the middle for as long as we can. It's not just vanity, it's linked to survival.

And I call it a tragedy. For no matter how the other layers of our sexual onions are telling us about and directing us via romance, companionship, a swell sense of humor, and other learned or imprinted attraction methods, none of these things slows down the wrinkling of skin, the greying of hair, the slacking of bellies, bottoms and breasts. So even if our giant, wise, clever brains and affectionate, caring, pretty souls continue to increase the value of our spirits, we age in body.

I don't mind admitting that I absolutely loved my young body -- I love my body now too, but I'll admit I notice what is and isn't as taunt and firm as it once was. I loved more how I looked at 20 than I do at 40. (Where the head was at is another tale entirely.) I felt as wonderful as I looked. Losing that sucks. Losing this blush of youth means we are devalued as sex partners. Again as a woman, one who likes sex, I mourn that loss.

Which brings us, in some fashion or other, to the other discussion Tom Paine's posts prompted.

Curvaceous Dee posted on what freedom to blog, among other things, is allowed or felt when one has family. This reminded me of this bit Gracie wrote awhile ago, on why women are still not allowed to be happy sexual creatures.

On a personal level the main reason I remain the anonymous collector here is because I don't wish to invite trouble. As noted before, simply collecting this stuff puts you if not on the defense at least at the ready to defend yourself from folks who just don't understand.

My being a woman who likes nudes is 'bad' enough. As a female collector and admirer of female nudes (which I began with) means my sexuality is open to interpretation. I pretty much laugh it off but this affects others. If I am a lesbian, then what is my male husband? And while he laughs it off too (honestly, we both have a bi streak), this matter of people discussing our sexuality is a inappropriate. I don't spend half the time worrying about who is before me (and who they are or might be screwing) as those who spot my collections do. I do enjoy looking at images of nudity and sex, as well as reading about it, but pondering a person's sex life? I think it's presumptuous, rude and, like asking what another person earns in salary or wages a year, it's none of my damn business.

And then there is the matter of displaying such things in your home -- especially if you have children about. And currently this isn't a laughing matter because I know authors of erotic who have had child protective services evaluate them for such a thing. I don't want those sort of problems.

Fundamentally I am anonymous for the ease of things -- but it angers me too. Why should I have to do this? Why should I have to shield and 'protect' family and friends from such associations when nudity, sexuality, is completely natural and normal?

Being a child of the 60's (technically born in, however those first few years I was but an infant), I do believe that if you're not part of the solution you are part of the problem. So sitting back resting on my anonymity feels like I am wrong there too.

While I'd truly like the world to be free enough to sexuality as a whole, I do realize this is not so. And any battle I would pick on behalf of being part of the solution would mean I was selecting this battle as one for those I know and love as well. So I let the cool waters of unselfishness sooth the agitated heated waters of these unjust realities.

And while the above is 90% of my reasoning, there's a remaining 10%...

If y'all knew who I was in 'real life' you'd have expectations about what I should say, what I shouldn't say, and what I should have said better. Being anonymous allows me the freedom to guess and, yes, to just throw shit out here now and then. Which kinda goes back to the other 90% because then my reputation, lowered somehow say by a quick posting on my mourning beauty, would affect those I love.

And while it would suck to be considered 'sub par' on my (perceived) abilities, I could handle it -- even if it meant that on top of fading youth and beauty this loss in status means I'd really be moving from the front of the herd to the back but fast! -- but the loss of status would be much harder for my husband and kids. Who would want to be related to that dumb sex obsessed blogger?

Labels: , , , ,

Mute Mondays

This week's theme is Dog Days...






The above are images I had on my pc -- I have no information about them.



Via Eros Blog. (Hey, is that a Mala-mute? lol)



Via Jupiter Images.

This last one is an art piece by Daniel Edwards featuring a naked Paris Hilton undergoing an autopsy.


Labels: , ,

Thursday, July 26, 2007

The Proof (and?) Lies In Mermaids

The erotic mermaid, nude breasts exposed and genitals covered in scales, is proof that tease is more arousing than, well, any other fish in the sea.


With mermaids the attraction is the (however unlikely) goal of scaling the mountain (nice pun there, huh?); the process of obtaining is at least equal to the goal or having.


Of course, if we take this as proof of tease -- or anything else -- then we must also believe that smoking cigarettes is do-able underwater.



I don't always have the answers, you know.

But I do like looking at the images and objects. And coming up with theories, however valid they may or may not be.

Labels: ,

Hey, I'm Number 3!

In Sugasm, the best of this week's blogs by the bloggers who blog them and highlighting the top 3 posts as chosen by Sugasm participants, I'm number 3 in issue #89. Want in Sugasm #90? Submit a link to your best post of the week using this form. Participants, repost the link list within a week and you're all set.

This Week's Picks
Burlesque
"She performs astounding acts and swirls her perfect ass in circles, like the tassles on her tits."

Nylon Whispers
"I run my fingers along every bit of my nylon covered flesh"

No Timeless Beauty To Conform To
"While fashions themselves come and go, so do the standards of beauty rise and fall like the heaving breasts of an excited woman."

Mr. Sugasm Himself
Welcome to the Redesign

Editor's Choice
Catalina loves (sex in) Sevilla

More Sugasm
Join the Sugasm

See also: Fleshbot's Sex Blog Roundup each Tuesday and Friday.

NSFW Pics, Videos & Audio
Half-Nekkid and Asking for It
I Feel Myself
Inspiration
Lindsay Lohan Naked Pictures On Internet?
Professional dress code
Time For Tits

Erotic Writing and Experiences
Another Ride
Dirty Lace
A gay lesson
Joining the Half-Mile-High Club San Francisco, part 9
Office Masturbation - part 4
Poker
Postage Stamp Sex
Private Show pt. 1
Rape Fantasies
Repressed
Romance
She Dancin' with a G

Sex News
Find Your Love Match Among Hegre Art's Models

Thoughts on Sex and Relationships
BDSM Part II; etymolgy, history, psychology
Can you can can?
Commentators
Fuck Your Fucking Ethics
The Glory That Is Myra Breckinridge
I wish I'd known that...
Lip Service
Panties Tell You What I'm Wanting
"Thank You"
Things I Would Like to See in Porn
Tom made me think

Sex & Politics
No Payola

BDSM & Fetish
Featured Fetish - Urophilia (Pee, Piss, Watersports)
Happy HNT - Metal bondage fun and a naughty night with Shasta Gibson
Sick
Singing about spanking
Submissive List
Torrent

Labels:

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Prostitution Signs


A 1941 Las Vegas hotel sign (via Answers.com).

I have a few of these signs, most are original (and packed away right now), but I do have this reproduction of a New Orleans sign out in my front foyer:



You can buy a Beware Pickpockets and Loose Women sign here.

Labels: , ,

Marilyn Monroe: All I Need Is This Doll

I shouldn't stay up late at night. It's the best time to write and research uninterrupted, but I also watch TV now and then. And the other night I watched Bio's Dead Famous episode on Marilyn Monroe.

It's not that I was creeped out by the idea of ghosts, and in fact, nothing very spectacular was shown to indicate ghostly activity by Marilyn. However, at the 'communication circle' (aka seance), the spirit of Marilyn supposedly said that she wanted to move on, but that all the fans, all the love and adoration, tied her here.

I have to admit, that bit stuck.

As a collector, I often feel that the objects I own (as well as those I covet) are imbued with forces. Call them life forces, energies, or what have you, but these things are not merely things.

And even if it is in my own mind, this idea that these things carry more than their weight or mass which can be measured on standard scales -- even if it is my own romanticism that makes me hope for life to continue and for the possibility that souls or ghosts can inhabit our concrete world of rational thought and meat -- ideas are real if not tangible. Ideas are the bulk of human existence. They are our own realities, at least until proven otherwise &/or new ideas take their place.

So, what if the cultural love of Marilyn Monroe actually holds some power?
More books have been written about Monroe than any other entertainer, some guessing over 600 books ~ with new releases each year.
So writes DeeDee at Sex-Kitten in her review of Sarah Churchwell's The Many Lives of Marilyn Monroe. And the books on Marilyn keep coming.

I'll admit I own more than a few books on Monroe -- what girl who collects pinups and other iconography of sex doesn't have a few Marilyn items in her collection? But in the past few years (perhaps 8 or so years) I've shied away from books on Marilyn. Not only does it seem glutinous, but no book has brought out anything new, despite the claims to the contrary. In the end you just feel like you're a part of the giant machine which feeds off of her -- dead or alive.

And what if that feeding includes some sort of psychic one which ties her here? What if she'd like to leave but our our ownership of her image, her objects, binds her to us?

More from DeeDee's review of Churchwell's book:
This is the ultimate cohesive look at most (if not all) that has been written about Marilyn, right down to reviewer comments at Amazon for these books, and what is shown is not only the legend of Marilyn and how she's been used, but our response and ability to perpetuate the myths as well.

...What's most impressive about this work is the transformation which occurs. As you read, you move Monroe from some 'thing' for our cultural and personal needs, to if not fully human at least considering the possibility that she was a complicated living human being which cannot not easily be understood from the fragments of her life which remain. Once we begin to see that she's not so easily characterized for our 'needs', to be made to symbolize our cultural or personal issues, we then need to look at why we -- readers and society at large -- do this.

We are not completely dehumanized (as we've done to Marilyn) but we certainly have to take a look at ourselves as a swarming mass of millions -- and as individuals. What is this compulsion to make Marilyn something? Why do we not see how dehumanizing our process is? Why is our quest &/or belief system more important than the person we profess to love?

We must now see ourselves moving from lover to stalker; our jealous perceptions of what others may know or say wounds us as if she had cheated on us in real life. She is our goddess, and we own her.

If the biographers have motives so do we the readers and fans who purchase nearly anything with her image on it. There's no denying that we have dehumanized Marilyn Monroe (yes, even little Norma Jeane too) even as we've placed her among our pop culture dieties and cultural icons.
If there is such a thing as ghosts or spirits, wouldn't, couldn't our collective obsession with her royally muck things up?

And if we knew it to be true, and the seance message was true, would we let her go?

Or would we continue our necrophilic lust because our need to own the icon was more important to us?


Maybe it's because it's late, and I'm up alone... But I'm tempted to burn all my Monroe items just on the chance...

Except for that one doll...

And those photos...

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

F. Holland Day

Eighty years before Bruce Weber rocketed to fame with a shot of pole vaulter Tom Hintnaus in a pair of Calvin Klein briefs leaning against a wall with his head back and his eyes closed, F. Holland Day made a similar photograph of a teen athlete as St. Sebastian.
Via Band of Thebes.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Monday, July 23, 2007

The Tattooed Lady (Vintage Nudes)




And, while I'm thinking of it, Lydia The Tatooed lady by Groucho Marx:

Labels: , , , ,

The (Erotic) Boys of Summer

Via Bunny, I discovered Mute Mondays. This week's theme is The Boys of Summer...



Via GayPaintings.com.


Via Steve Jordan.


Via Edwardian Delights.

Labels: , , ,

Dimensions In The Female Form In Art

According to this pinup site (in German, translated via Google), these are the measurements of "the dream woman" in art and pinups over the years -- statistics calculated from painted pictures -- specifically works from 1890, 1930 and 1970.


I tried to do other searches to find out who did this, but found nothing; so it's not super credible. However, I don't see anything outrageously wrong. I think we all know that the ideal woman has gotten taller, yet weighs less. Note how the body mass is redistributed, including smaller knees and ankles (though admittedly, the gals in 1890 had very slim ankles for their weight & body shape).

Labels: , , ,

Friday, July 20, 2007

Cheating Men

While I'm still thinking about men who cheat on their wives, I found this article most interesting.

Al Martinez, at the LA Times, says of Antonio Villaraigosa "Mayor not unlike other men in power":
What they did, while possibly distasteful on many levels, not to mention unethical, is not unusual among men in power and the women who pursue them. To make my point, I bring you a brief contemporary history of illicit sex on a higher level.

Beginning with the World War II era, which many of you may recall, two prominent figures were said to be doing, well, **it** with their female assistants while married to others. That would be then-Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower with driver Kay Summersby while married to Mamie, and President Franklin D. Roosevelt with secretary Lucy Mercer while married to Eleanor.

Due to a more protective stance back then in the days preceding mad-dog journalism, the public knew nothing of those affairs, involved as we were with whopping the Germans and the Japanese, not to mention their little brothers, the Italians.

Since then, we've had a succession of presidents, some of whom have managed to work in a little on the side while running the country. Prominent among them was John F. Kennedy. He dallied with Marilyn Monroe, who sang happy birthday to him at Madison Square Garden as if it were a mating call, and Judith Campbell Exner, who, it was said, had gangland connections.
Martinez naturally gets around to Clinton. Which reminded me of Gracie's post, It's Lonely At The Top; It's Lonely Everywhere, which focuses not only on Bill himself, but on the TV's Boston Legal and the relationships men have with each other.

Perhaps 'that uncertain feeling' is a more poignant loneliness which too many men mistake for lust. After all, men are raised to be problem solvers -- men of action. And seduction and sex are a filled with action. It's also more culturally acceptable for a man to approach a woman than another man. Of course, she's more likely to empathize than another male and this sharing makes her more willing to have sex...

So there's the math.

Perhaps if John Lewis had befriended Ieuan, or some other chap, he would have found himself less interested in Liz. Then again, he could have turned more to his wife who no doubt would have welcomed the connection herself... But first, John would have needed to identify that uncertain feeling as a loneliness not of the flesh.

It's not that the wives of these men, powerful or impotent feeling, don't understand them -- it's that the men do not really understand themselves. (Maybe they need to at least watch the clips in Gracie's post?)

But now I am getting into psychology, and I'm only admitting to being an amateur historian. *wink*

Labels: , , ,

Bottoms

I've written quite a bit here the past few days, so now I'll let some others do the talking. All you need to do is click and read.

As the title indicates, the only (loose) theme here is about being at the bottom, saying 'bottoms up' in a congratulatory way, or it's at or near the end of the post where the points are most interesting.

(A mighty contrived way to post a risque photo.)

No Sex Please. We're British

Lessons Of The Dodo

The Incredible Shrinking Woman

Gown, Gems of Maria Felix, Mexico's Marilyn, Will Sell in NYC

Labels: ,

Who's The Greatest Person InSex History?

Just found the Sex History Show, which offers Internet radio, podcasts &/or MP3 downloads on topics of sex history, as well as show transcripts and forums etc.

I'll be adding the site to the ol' sidebar in just a bit, but I wanted to point out Episode #003 - Greatest. here's part of the transcript:

Randal: So, John. On our last show you promised you'd introduce us to the most important person in the history of sex.

Allie: Well, I think an obvious answer is Alfred Kinsey[1]. He changed everything we thought we knew about who we were sexually.

John: Sure, Kinsey showed us what was out there, but he didn't change what was possible. That took a lot of other people to make happen.

Randal: Well, how about Anthony Comstock[2] who brutally repressed free-thinking about sex for a century?

John: Another good choice, but my choice for the most important person in the history of sex is ... well, let's hear from her.

Sanger: "No woman can call herself free who does not own and control her body. No woman can call herself free until she can choose consciously whether she will or will not be a mother."

Sanger: "A free race cannot be born of slave mothers. "[3]

Allie: Hey! That's Margaret Sanger! She started Planned Parenthood[4]!

John: Yes, though it was called the American Birth Control League when she founded it in 1921.

Labels: , ,

A Review of Only Two Can Play/That Uncertain Feeling, By Kingsley Amis

That Uncertain Feeling, the hilarious novel by Kingsley Amis, now filmed as Only Two Can Play, starring Peter Sellers, Mai Zetterling, Virginia Maskell. A British Lion Production. A Four Square Book, The New English Library, Ltd., #229. (September, 1962, reprinting of the work published in August, 1955.)

The back of the paperback says, "When this novel was first published it was praised everywhere for its boldness, comedy and style." One of the reviewer quotes used reads, "I must warn readers that this book speaks with the shocking directness about the way of a man with a woman" (John Betjeman, Daily Telegraph). If this is true, I cannot speak to it as I am a woman. However, the book is about a man and told from his perspective (as well as was written by a man), so 'tis more than likely.

The plot is simple. John Lewis is a married assistant librarian in the Welsh town of Aberdarcy, and he and his wife (jean) of just past 5 years are in the dreaded rut, complete with young children and money issues. One morning a wealthy and attractive married woman, Liz, comes into the library. It soon becomes clear that Liz would like to check out more than some books. What complicates the plot, making it more than just the traditional fantasies of a married man (a la the Seven year Itch), is that Liz's husband, Vernon, is in a position to give John a promotion (and a much desired raise).

What fascinates is that John is a rather moral fellow. At first he only believes the attraction to Liz is that she is female fodder for a bit of fantasy and that in fact, she's not (nor would be) interested in him. While finding her attractive, he is also somewhat repelled -- he rather dislikes her position of privilege. (This also speaks of a common human reaction to insecurity -- to loath and disdain prior to being loathed or disdained -- and the reaction to such thoughts, such as to covet.)

But eventually Liz corners John, and he gives in to first one kiss. Then another meeting, and another kiss -- the sort of kiss which is, as Liz says, a "commitment" on his part to further activities...

John's moral reaction isn't exactly as expected -- nor cliched. Perhaps this is the "shocking directness" of a man regarding women that we've been warned about. Whatever; it makes for great reading. This is a passage which illuminates John's thoughts as well as the novel's original title of That Uncertain Feeling:
How, then, was I going to spend the next hour, or rather, adding Jean's usual surcharge, hour and a half? In defending myself, presumably, against a certain feeling. Such defence was never easy, because of its habit of confusing itself with the feeling. How to define this feeling? Depression? Not a bad shot. Boredom? Oh yes. A slight twinge, too, eh, of uneasiness and inert, generalised, lust? Yes, indeed. The centre of it might be called boredom, but not the same sort as the boredom which was fond of attacking me in slack periods in the Library. That was bemused, trance-like, even vaguely pleasurable, like the drowsiness it so often merged into; this, to-night, was restless. It had already stopped me from starting to read, it would shortly drive me to the window again as if I expected someone to call (though I didn't and no one would), it would, later on, make me want to go out to the pub, at the same time informing me that it wouldn't be worth it, that I shouldn't like it there and would at once start wanting to come home.

Yes, it was all very difficult. Curious, too, was the way something so efficient should be so hard to define. But, having for once tried to define it instead of letting it sneak up and jump on my back, I felt a little cheered.
John then turns to his hidden girly magazine.
It represented a full-figure girl wearing a curious yachting costume consisting mainly of a peaked cap, a pair of seaman's boots, and a small, inefficient-looking telescope. Apart from these, she wore two pieces of cloth with a nautical stripe, one covering a good deal of the lower half of her breasts, the other an almost irreducible minimum at the crotch. An expression of guarded joviality was on her face. This jolly skipper, I read in a panel near her right boot, is curvesome Marietta DuForgue, now vacationing at Las Palmas. The dimensions of this trim craft are 38" for'ard, 23" amidships, and 36" aft. What wouldn't you give for a chance of getting her to heave to. Shaking my head over these vulgarities, in particular the maladroit change of image from 'skipper' to 'craft', I went on looking at the photograph.
I didn't just include that section for the giggles. I think it clearly illustrates how John intellectually processes, even to say to himself, "this isn't good," but how he continues anyway. What we know isn't always what we do. And sometimes, we'll accept this lowering of our standards because we don't know what else to do with ourselves, our uncertain feelings. Despite certain knowledge of 'bad' we find ourselves not sure how to be 'good.' And sex, lust, emotions, they aren't solved or sated with our intellectual knowledge.

So our boy John struggles with his uncertain feeling. He has some ambiguity regarding adultery with Liz, but he is most uncomfortable with the idea of Liz fixing the job promotion. Not only is this sort of political, who-you-know game completely against his philosophy, one of the others up for the job is a coworker named Ieuan who in John's opinion, needs the additional pay even more than John. Eventually, though, John and Liz do it. (Not a very erotic bit and I should say that none of this book is really intended to be erotic.)

Immediately afterwards, John realizes that Liz could have been any woman really. And if that's anti-climactic, he's most upset about the job interview being fixed to favor him. He tells Liz to stop her plans, stop her husband, and chucks it all away to return home to Jean, literally and figuratively.

Jean's response as betrayed wife is very real and honest. (This impresses me because the book is touted as such a man's point of view.) Jean doesn't really care that John's screwed Liz because to her, the real pain and loss occurred when she realized that John wanted Liz more than he wanted her. The consummation of his lust is not the real issue.

However, Amis via Jean, carries the attitude and reaction to betrayal even further -- and I think even more realistically.

In the middle of their heated discussion of the situation, John's betrayal with Liz, Jean tells John that she doesn't want to hear about it. The details are unimportant, what's done is done, no need to say anything more -- but of the job? Well, Jean has a lot to say about that.
You couldn't just do it and forget about it, not you, you had to make a bloody fuss, so you told her what to do with the job she'd landed you. Don't talk to me about Ieuan, you don't care what happens to Ieuan, or his wife. You forgot you were married to me, though, that's what makes me so mad. If it had just been your job you were turning down, fair enough, you could do as you liked. But it wasn't just your job, it was my job as well, and the kids' too. But you didn't care about that, you'd got to make your stand and be bloody sensitive. Well, I hope you're satisfied.
She continues to tell John the usual, like he's sleeping alone. And when he tries to kiss her, she slugs him. But then Jean gets a second wind.
What you'd better do is to make up to Elizabeth again quick. Get her to take you away for the week-end or something. I don't care how you do it, but make sure the affair's on again. And then tell her you want that job after all, see? You didn't mean what you said, you acted hastily, something like that. You'll know what to say, I bet. But you get that job back, else I'll stop cooking for you --
Jean even lies and says she's had an affair (with a poet John cannot stand) when she has not.

John is devastated. To sleep alone a night, or many, is likely not anything unexpected let alone unwarranted. But when your wife says she'll stop being your wife in all ways... Well, there's real damage done.

John's hit bottom. Early that night, after Liz and he do it on the beach, not only did John end things with Liz but her husband told John in no uncertain terms to stay away. John's potential promotion isn't exactly something within his control -- and that means losing Jean.

In the end, John is offered the job but he declines and Ieuan gets it. John, Jean and the kids start over in the town where John grew-up. There, at a party, we find John being hit-on by another attractive, yet married, woman. She'd like to leave the party and have a hook-up asap. John hurriedly makes an excuse to the hostess and then quickly makes for the door.

Jean, who was nearby the hostess and so heard John's excuse and saw his departure, catches up with him outside. John tells her that he had to get away from that woman. They smile and walk off together.

Into the sunset? Perhaps. John seems a wiser man, and Jean clearly will keep a watchful eye.

The book is an interesting look at the deterioration of a marriage -- but not a cliched one. Jean's no over-bearing shrew, John's no moral-free playboy, and neither is the anti-Christ. While nothing in particular drives a wedge between them (of the sort that Hollywood would contrive to create a plot anyway), what makes this all work is the interior monologue and subtle actions of John Lewis.

His thoughts are not unrealistic; his actions not so flamboyant. He has morals, but sometimes his intellect makes things a bit too tidy sometimes. He's just a guy with that uncertain feeling, in a marriage with that uncertain feeling, and opportunity is thrust to meet his lust and what's a guy to do? His decisions are not well-made, but in reading how he arrived at those decisions you can see how too easily this can happen. Suddenly you find yourself in a cluster-fuck. That's pretty human. And the excellent part is that all the other characters, trapped inside the cluster or outside of it, are all realistically human too. Right down to the habitually cheating Liz, her seemingly distracted (or tolerant) husband, and the supporting characters such as Ieuan and the Lewis' downstairs neighbors.

Solid stuff. Solid vintage stuff.

One complication for me was the English -- not just the language (which does differ, you chaps -- for example, I didn't know what Jerries were), but much of the book deals with what I can only presume is the classic battle of the English versus the Welsh. While actual Welsh spelling isn't used (thank gawd), some of the terms and nearly all of the jabs about being Welsh or English were over my head. This does not render the novel worthless, but means one really has to pay more attention than I had assumed the paperback would require. It really is a good read.

Only Two Can Play VHS As noted, the work was turned into a film, Only Two Can Play, in 1962, apparently with the usual book-to-film changes, including a slightly different ending. It starred Peter Sellars as John Lewis, Virginia Maskell as Jean Lewis, Mai Zetterling as Liz (Elizabeth) Gruffydd-Williams, and Richard Attenborough as Vernon Gruffydd-Williams.

The BBC also made this a television series in 1985, staring Denis Lawson and Sheila Gish, under the original novel title, That Uncertain Feeling.

Labels: , , , ,

Men, It's Not The Size Of Your Club But Your Willingness To Share It Which Matters

First of all, I know you've all seen this, so I'm not presenting this Giant Homer Simpson Freaks Out English Countryside as 'news'. (Shocking idea isn't it, the notion that I, a lady bent on vintage porn, historical erotica and sexual history, were to present 'news'?!)

When I first saw this image I guessed it was photoshopped -- or at best a juxtaposition of two images -- an amusing artist rendering for the Wordless Wednesday meme, or other commentary on the cultural division between the young, immature, commercial, crass US and the old, steeped-in-antiquity, classy Brits.

In a way, the article proves my point.

In merry old England, a donut proffering man in his undies is more offensive than a nude man with well-defined, slightly exaggerated genitalia.

The English -- hell, not just English folks, but pagan English folks are outraged by "this darn great eyesore" that is Homer Simpson. In the USA pagan outrage is rather the definition of the moral way, the way things should be here in our God fearing country. Pagans are the ones who would (or would be accused of) putting on grand display human nudity -- and conservatives would freak out.

In fact, the very remedy for nude artwork might be to cover it up with something else... And if a company is willing to pay the expense, well, let it be a logo! (You know, it really wouldn't take much effort to turn the Cerne Abbas Giant into Homer. With just a few additional lines the giant's penis could easily become a pair of Y-fronted undies.)

While we can only guess as to what the nude giant hillfigure means, what he stands (erect) for, most guess he is a tribute to masculinity. For hundreds of years it was custom to erect a maypole within the hillfigure (one can imagine where) and childless couples would dance to promote fertility. They say that childless couples try to get as close as they can get to the giant (being a National Trust, it's the bottom of the hill) to have blessed sex and conceive. And English girls visit the old naked man, praying not to become 'old maids.'

Which makes me think that, in all reality, Homer and the Cerne Abbas Giant are very much the same.

The giant has his great physical prowess noted in his large attributes, his two big clubs if you will. He is both hunter & provider in terms of both food and sex. He is the male virility required for species survival.

Today, Homer represents our version of male virility. He has one small hidden (beneath fat and underpants) penis -- but then we know it needn't be so large to do the trick, and as proof he has three offspring. His other club is the donut. A freakishly large donut that, as he stands there in bloody England, he is willing to share. Homer too can be counted on for our species survival.

Certainly most US girls pray they won't play Marge to their own future Homer husbands. But on the other hand, there are worse things a girl could do.

If the promotional chalk Homer could survive to be 'discovered' by scholars centuries into the future, I'm sure they'd draw similar conclusions. (At least if they had as much knowledge of us here in 2007 as we do about folks in the 17th century.) Then again, what do I know?

Well, I do know that the pop culture figure is not only more well known here in the US, but more likely to remain so than the Cerne Abbas Giant -- even if the giant has been carved into the natural chalk earth and is centuries old. After the promotional chalk has washed away, Homer the character will certainly continue to exist for us. Yet even just a year from now, the ancient "aroused, club-wielding man" likely won't even have become a trivia question.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, July 19, 2007

Anatomy of a Pin-Up Photo


What's perhaps most interesting about this work by Annie Sprinkle is that last line (bottom right), which reads:
(In spite of it all, I'm sexually excited and feeling great!)
This piece is in Xxxooo: Love And Kisses From Annie Sprinkle (30 Post-Porn Postcards), by Annie Sprinkle, and is in The Body: Photographs of the Human Form, edited by William Ewing.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

The Passion Flower Puzzle


It's mod, daddio. Vintage 60's.

The Passion Flower Puzzle, Buzz Cardigan #3, by Don Rico, published by Lancer (#73-793), 1968.

Labels: ,

Monday, July 16, 2007

Should You Care To...

Vote for this blog:

My blog was nominated for Best Hobby Blog, Best Blog About Stuff, and Best Pop Culture Blog.

And as part of this interview, you may also vote for Silent Porn Star.

Labels: ,

Friday, July 13, 2007

Femme Mimics, 1954

Femme Mimics, by E. Carlton Winford, 1954, displayed here at Queer Music Heritage:
In 1951 Winford was searching for an idea for a book that would be "something different," when a chance meeting with a former female impersonator gave him the idea. He spent three years researching and contacting performers from all over the country. In his epilogue he recounts how difficult this was, as he was met with suspicion from many who feared being made the subject of ridicule and gossip. While many of the attitudes in his writing are outdated by today's standards, it is my impression that the project evolved into an earnest attempt to present this as a legitimate form of entertainment.
Found via Fabulon.

Labels: , , ,

No Timeless Beauty To Conform To

Years from now, people will see this photo and know 'what vintage' it is.


While I cannot say what form 'beauty' and 'the erotic female' will take for future pleasure seekers, the perky breasts with tan lines, the complete 'Brazilian', the pose, and the incomplete headless female form will speak of our times just as natural pubic hair speaks, mainly, of earlier times.


(Viewers of my collection who frown &/or are repulsed by my magazines featuring women with natural body hair mistakenly guess these are hirsute publications because of our current dislike of women with pubic hair. It takes some explaining to get them to understand that while razors were around, bush was as exciting in sight and texture as the complete removal of it supposedly is today. It wasn't until bikinis and other fashions became the norm that trimming was even a 'grooming' issue -- for women.)

Preachings of feminism and body hair aside -- and even discussion of standards of beauty and desire being not just a social construct but a cultural response to economics left for another time -- the point I'm getting to is that there are markers & clues to the periods of time from which objects come. Clothing, hairstyle, makeup, the cars on which bodies sprawl, other objects can offer clues; but so do body types themselves.


While fashions themselves come and go, so do the standards of beauty rise and fall like the heaving breasts of an excited woman. Learning to see the beauty, or at least acknowledging another form of beauty, is often a struggle for some collectors of nudes and erotic art works.

Interestingly, at least to me, is the notion that for most of history (being just that, his-story), the idealized standard of beauty is not only recorded, but that the recordings show woman's willingness to conform to it.

Before you think I'm going all patriarchal on your ass, let me remind you of the fact: This is a patriarchal time.

In fact, for most of recorded history, it has been. (I'll refer you to Cows, Pigs, Wars, and Witches: The Riddles of Culture for more information.)

I'm not going to argue this fact, nor complain about it (at this time), or even justify it (I do have my theories, after all). But for now, I merely want to point out the dearth of documentation which shows the female desire to be desirable.

The defense of this, as much required for my own sanity as any other feminist reading this, will likely be a plethora of postings. But as unsettling as this is -- and it is -- at this point it would be incredibly silly of me not to note it.

Photo credits: Top nude, ~pinuplover at deviantART; middle, my own pc stash; last, LLAPA.

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, July 12, 2007

A Study In Victorian (Printed) Erotica

Grumpy Old Bookman discusses Victorian pornography. This third part focuses on an intriguing 1882 publication called The Mysteries of Verbena House.
The subtitle is 'Miss Bellasis Birched for Thieving', which, if you know anything about Victorian porn, speaks for itself.

The book was published privately, in a print run of 150 copies. The price was four guineas, a sum which you can probably multiply by 100 to get today's equivalent price (perhaps US$600). This, of course, placed it far beyond the reach of the vulgar crowd.
The cost at the time would be the equivalent of two weeks pay now. Which as we know from the banned books post, wasn't uncommon -- either price them out of range, or mark them for "private collections" or the medical community, and you're publishing-ass was covered.

So speaking as a collector, the limited number of copies then leads to an even less abundant number of books now -- far, far out of my reach. (Though I too have spotted French versions now and then.) So the closest I may ever come to knowing this book is via Grumpy. Viva La Internet.

His post is full of mystery, as (perhaps only) the literate and astute (collectors &/or researchers) can really appreciate. I am so 'there.'

One thing I noted from Grumpy's post was this bit on Algernon Swinburne:
And Swinburne was yet another Victorian who, as a result of his experience at Eton, was totally obsessed by flagellation. Though in his case his interest was masochist rather than sadistic; his sole sexual interest was in being the slave of a beautiful, violent woman.
Apparently this making of a Dom or sub is a very common English school phenomenon which continues today.

Just another reason for a kinky American to wish to travel abroad. (Of course, I mean to look for the books. Or speak with Grumpy Old Bookman. *wink*)

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

1970 Raquel Welch Interview

Just after the premier of Myra Breckinridge, Raquel Welch was on the Dick Cavett Show with Janis Joplin:

Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, July 10, 2007

Yeah, But Did She Get His Autograph?

Lauren Vaughn, aspiring porn starlet, is excited at getting to work "with none other than THE Lexington Steele!":
I'm so giddy that I can barely contain myself. I mean, I used to get off to his porn for goodness' sake! And now little 'ol me gets to be in a real live scene with him???
Apparently the shoot went swimmingly. And the star-struck-starlet said, "I was totally shaking in my boots around Lex and I made the confession - on film! - that I had a little "thing" for him."

So I wonder, did she get his autograph? Maybe it's just me, but I'd think nothing of asking a porn star to sign a porno box... After what he did to her box, how 'rude' could it be? *wink*

Labels: , ,

Sunday, July 08, 2007

Views On Vintage Nudes

Over at Collectors' Quest, Deanna's posted an interview with artists who repurpose/recycle vintage items. One of those interviewed was Tia of Hey Lady! Recycled Cards, who has used vintage pinups and nude photos to make her cards.



While the cards are neat, I'm still a bit torn about using the actual old photos/images themselves...


However, since I was Etsy anyway, I did a quick search for the word 'nude' and this is some of what I found:

Nude with striped socks.
Nudes embracing.
Vintage nude necklace.
Nude male torso.
French doll bag.
Boobie earrings.

Some of these are also made with actual vintage images...



Now that I've shown you some images, please do tell: What are your thoughts on recycling old images?

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, July 04, 2007

Lost Girls by Alan Moore and Melinda Gebbie

Lost Girls: A Review:

It's not just that it's surprising -- although it is. The first printing of "Lost Girls" -- 10,000 copies -- sold out in a day. The second printing, also of 10,000 copies, sold out in advance two days later. The day the book went on sale, it hit Amazon.com's "Top 20." And it's gotten passionate rave reviews, not just from the adult press, but from places like Publisher's Weekly, USA Today, Kirkus Reviews, Variety, Booklist, and many, many others -- and from individuals ranging from Neil Gaiman to Brian Eno to Susie Bright.

A pretty surprising response for a book of pornography -- and even more surprising given that it's essentially a big, beautifully-made dirty comic book.

Labels: , ,

Bachelor Pad Magazine

The Java's Bachelor Pad Empire is expanding! First it was the retro-themed website Java's Bachelor Pad. Then came The Bachelor Pad Radio Show. That was followed by the popular on-line pin-up contest, the JBP Cheesecake Contest. Then came events like the Cocktails and Cheesecake Party, Atomic Frolic, and Mondo Lounge Atomic Frolic. Now, Jason “Java” Croft brings his love of atomic-age culture to the printed page with his newest project titled, simply enough, Bachelor Pad Magazine.

Issue #1, slated from September 2007, will feature:

  • Pin-ups from Kay O'Hara and Bernie Dexter.
  • Lifestyle advice from Cherry Capri.
  • Movie reviews from Will "The Thrill" Viharo.
  • Entertaining tips from Penny Star Jr.
  • A tell-all tale from burlesque producer Lili VonSchtupp.
  • Pin-up modeling tips from Heidi Van Horne.
  • Drink recipes from mixologist Dr. Bamboo.
  • Comics from the guys behind Untamed Highway.
  • Plus other surprises from Java and his gang of swingers!
  • Subscribe now -- not only will it ensure the mag gets made, but the first issues will be collectible!

    Labels: , ,

    Tuesday, July 03, 2007

    Look For SPS!

    I registered (finally) at CQ's community. Since this is for mainstream folks, I kept it rather tame and so far have just posted some of my feminist buttons and bumper stickers. I'm too tired to do any more than that, but will get to my books as soon as I can.



    If you join (and it is free), look for sps and feel free to make me your 'buddy' and send me a message.

    Labels: , ,

    Sugasm #86

    The best of this weeks blogs by the bloggers who blog them. Highlighting the top 3 posts as chosen by Sugasm participants. Want in Sugasm #87? Submit a link to your best post of the week using this form. Participants, repost the link list within a week and you’re all set.

    This Week’s Picks
    Menage
    "Sometimes, she's even more the centre of things than he is, since she is a more recent addition to the dynamic, and since we both adore her."

    Money and Sex
    "And then in walks sex, #1 potential button pusher of all times."

    Denied - 11
    "There's a click, and a lifting of restriction, and cool, soothing moistness."

    Mr. Sugasm Himself
    The Skeptical Pornographer: The G-Spot.

    Editor’s Choice
    A fitting for a marriage

    More Sugasm
    Join the Sugasm

    See also: Fleshbot's Sex Blog Roundup each Tuesday and Friday.

    Sex News & Reviews
    Fun Factory Layaspot Mini Vibrator Review
    NEW Designs Throughout the Shop!

    Thoughts on Sex and Relationships
    Adult Meme: Q & A
    A Brief History of Literature
    Cockwhore 101 - Spitting
    Have You Ever Used A Vibrator So Long That Even After You Stopped It Still Tingled?
    Internet fuck buddy
    Is it in yet?
    It’s Behind You! Hurry Before It
    Lesbian Sexuality 101
    Q & A For (More Than) One (I Hope!)
    Persian "Lover" - Part Two
    Read Me
    TMI, Anyone?
    What if today was the last day?

    BDSM & Fetish
    Bait
    Beer bottles and nipple clamps
    Daddy’s little girl
    Featured Fetish Film: Lez Go Retro (Lingerie, Nylon, Lesbian)
    Ms160 celebrates a birthday
    Oh, Sweet Release! (Kinda)
    Parking again
    Scenes From My Bedroom - Part 1: Taken
    Space

    Sex Work
    The Art of Teasing

    NSFW Pics, Videos & Audio
    BodyPaint - Pictorial Presentation
    Breann McGregor Undressed Nude Pictures
    Deep Tongue Lovin'
    LSG Models’ Latest Erotic Photos and Video
    San Francisco Pride Pix

    Sex & Politics
    The no porn pledge (And my response to other misguided people)
    Watching Big Love...

    Erotic Writing and Experiences
    Dirty Talking Girl
    Hot Summer Nights are a Voyeur’s Dream
    I know u want to
    In Love With Her Best Friend
    Laid
    Saved By The Bell
    Sexual Dreams~ ~#1
    Silver Screen
    Sleepy Time
    Sweet Release
    Unfinished
    When Joe Brought Suzy Home 3

    Labels:

    Monday, July 02, 2007

    Education In Porn

    After a screening of Hot and Bothered:Feminist Pornography, there was a group discussion regarding women and porn, featuring Jack Hafferkamp of Libido, Carolyn Caizzi from Early to Bed Productions, and Becky Goldberg, the maker of the documentary. Most interesting stuff:
    Woman [In the audience]: I'm back in school at DePaul, working a lot with anthropology and the idea of sex and how it empowers women, etc. Basically, answering this lady in asking you, I guess, the idea of sex, anthropologically speaking, is a power dynamic and there are many women whose agenda has been to, because they felt wounded, because they had felt raped or pillaged or whatever we go through in our society, that sex is kinda scary. So I think what you are up against is a bunch of fear from this society that's been told that the power dynamic is really that and you're trying to say "trust"-that the power dynamic can be really healthy and it can be good and so what if there's somebody in bed that's stronger, one weaker, what the gap is. How do you guys feel about that?

    Becky: I think it's partly an uneducation or an unsocialization and I think that really in our society, porn might not be fully accepted. I think that's how it is. But I definitely think the communication needs to happen, more so than it does now in our culture. I think that the communication between parents and their children needs to be more open, the sex education that happens in the schools. People on a base level need to be more comfortable with their sexuality, in general. Before you get to whether or not you want to watch porn, it's like you have to be OK with who you are, OK with your body. From my perspective, I think one of the common problems feminist pornography has from getting out there is that women don't even think that they can watch pornography and that it's not even made for them, so why would they even go there? So I think, though, at its base, it has to do with education.
    Image via PostSecret.

    Labels: , , , , ,

    A-Sordid Barbie Facts

    In Mondo Barbie I read about the boys who had more than sex fantasies of Barbie (apparently, it's not restricted to adolescent boys), and I've got a female cousin who admitted to using Barbie as a dildo for her masturbatory pleasure, so I'm not easily shocked by what the dolls have been used for. But I was surprised that the doll once had nipples.


    I should be surprised that moms were outraged and demanded Mattel remove them -- but I'm not. :sigh:

    Via KKC.

    See also, The Top 10 Reasons Why Barbie Is Like an Uber Model and A Doll's House: Barbie Revisited.

    Labels: , , ,

    Sunday, July 01, 2007

    I'll Gamble On Love Gamble

    The Love Gamble, by Harold Morrow, "The adventures in love of a girl who could be "all things to all men."


    From the front flap:
    Eleanor Curtis innocently flirted with danger and learned, to her sorrow, that all men were not to be trusted. She learned, too, that she possessed an abundance of what men termed "sex appeal." And, since men apparently laid their plans to ensnare unsuspecting girls, Eleanor decided to do the baiting and trapping herself. She would make other man pay for the injustice one her. She would discover what type of girl men seemed to desire, and she would thenceforth try to be that type! It would be a grand, gay game with her. "A man will do anything for the girl who knows how to handle him," Eleanor reflected. "No man is going to hurt me again. If there's any hurting to be done, I'm going to be the one to do it!"

    How little Eleanor realized what she was putting herself in for! If she could have known how hopelessly, madly, men would fall in love with her... how easy it would prove to captivate them...

    Here is a highly exciting tale of a self-appointed female "Don Juan" stringing three successful men along a merry path, each blissfully ignorant of the existence of the other two, until the crash comes -- and then, well...
    I got this at a flea market this weekend, and while a vintage book like this, at just $2 and with a copyright date of 1932 is fun enough for me, what sent me over the edge was the min-review of sorts written on the jacket itself. In a tight ink script it reads, "No Good this story, Feb 4 1935.


    I was excited before, but now I can hardly wait to read it! Will I agree with the previous owner? Is this a warning of content? Or a literary one?

    About the author, Harold Morrow, aka Harold M. Sherman:
    He wrote numerous books and magazine articles on a variety of subjects ranging from sports stories for boys to self‑help books, and books dealing with psychic phenomena and ESP. He also wrote many plays, some of which were produced on Broadway. The screenplay for the movie "Mark Twain" produced by Warner Brothers was also to his credit, as well as the movie "Are We Civilized." He was world renowned in the field of psychic research and conducted experiments with such prominent persons as Sir Hubert Wilkins, famous Artic explorer, Dr. J. B. Rhine of Duke University who coined the terms parapsychology and ESP, and astronaut Neil Armstrong.
    Dust jacket art by SKRENDA or S K Renda, who I know nothing about other than was a popular illustrator of jackets.

    Labels: , , , ,